Forward-Deployed Engineer
Senior Forward-Deployed Engineers (FDEs) who ship AI into your existing systems.
From Forward-Deployed Engineers to LLM Engineers to AI Security to Digital Twin. pre-vetted, 5–10+ years, transparent USD monthly rates, onboard in 48 hours.
Engineers who build, train, and ship AI systems. from research to production.
Senior Forward-Deployed Engineers (FDEs) who ship AI into your existing systems.
Senior ML Engineers from Devlyn.
Pre-vetted LLM engineers who build copilots, RAG systems, agents, and tool-calling pipelines.
Senior full-stack engineers fluent in modern AI APIs.
Senior AI Product Engineers who own AI features end-to-end.
Senior full-stack engineers who own AI features end-to-end.
Senior AI Research Engineers who reproduce, adapt, and harden frontier research for your product.
Senior NLP Engineers who design text classification, extraction, search, and dialog systems with both classical NLP and modern LLMs.
The specialists behind real RAG, agents, and AI reasoning systems.
Senior Agentic Workflow Engineers who design multi-agent systems with proper memory, tools, and human-in-loop.
Senior Retrieval Engineers who design embeddings, chunking, hybrid search, and reranking for enterprise RAG.
Senior Knowledge Engineers who build ontologies, taxonomies, and knowledge graphs that AI agents can reason on.
Senior Context Engineers who design memory, retrieval, and tool context for LLM and agent systems.
Senior Prompt Engineers who design, evaluate, and version prompts and prompt libraries.
Senior AI Systems Engineers who connect models, data, workflows, and tools into reliable enterprise AI systems.
Senior AI Platform Engineers who build reusable AI tooling, model gateways, evaluation infrastructure, and governance for your whole organization.
Senior AI Integration Engineers who connect LLMs and agents to Salesforce, SAP, NetSuite, Workday, HubSpot, ServiceNow, and bespoke ERPs.
MLOps, infrastructure, observability, and SRE for production AI.
Pre-vetted senior MLOps engineers who build training pipelines, model registries, deployment automation, drift detection, and CI/CD for AI systems.
Senior AI Infrastructure Engineers who design GPU clusters, optimize inference, and scale distributed compute.
Senior AI SREs who monitor hallucinations, drift, latency, and cost, and respond when probability bites.
Senior AI Automation Engineers who replace manual ops work with AI-native workflows.
Senior Platform Engineers who build internal developer platforms with golden paths, scorecards, and AI-aware tooling.
Senior SREs fluent in distributed systems, SLOs, incident response, and AI-aware observability.
Senior cloud engineers fluent in AWS, GCP, Azure, and Kubernetes.
Senior Distributed Systems Engineers fluent in concurrency, fault tolerance, and AI-scale data.
Data engineering, multimodal AI, edge AI, and digital twin specialists.
Pre-vetted senior data engineers who build streaming and batch pipelines, lakehouses, and feature stores ready for AI.
Senior Data Scientists who own experimentation, predictive modeling, and AI-ready analytics.
Senior Analytics Engineers who turn raw data into trusted, AI-ready datasets.
Senior Synthetic Data Engineers who generate tabular, text, image, and sensor data for regulated, data-scarce projects.
Senior Multimodal Engineers who combine vision, audio, and text models into real applications.
Senior Computer Vision Engineers fluent in detection, segmentation, OCR, video understanding, and modern VLMs.
Senior AI Edge Engineers who deploy models to phones, browsers, Jetson, Coral, and embedded hardware.
Senior Robotics AI Engineers fluent in ROS, NVIDIA Isaac, SLAM, perception, planning, and reinforcement learning.
Senior Digital Twin Engineers who build predictive simulations of physical systems for manufacturing, energy, logistics, and Industry 4.0.
AI security, governance, and architecture for regulated and enterprise environments.
Senior AI Security Engineers who threat-model, red-team, and harden LLM systems.
Senior AI Governance Engineers who translate AI policy into engineering controls.
Senior DevSecOps Engineers who shift security left for AI-heavy pipelines.
Senior Enterprise AI Architects who design AI strategy, target architecture, governance, and roadmap across the organization.
Senior backend engineers fluent in Go, Node, Python, Rust, and the AI APIs that ride on top.
Senior API Engineers fluent in REST, GraphQL, gRPC, MCP, and OpenAPI.
Senior Human-AI Interaction Engineers who design AI interfaces, voice flows, and feedback systems.
A CTO rarely needs “an AI engineer” in the abstract. The real question is which constraint blocks the business outcome: model quality, product integration, retrieval accuracy, workflow automation, infrastructure reliability, governance, cost, data readiness, or user adoption. This section helps buyers map the problem to the right specialist before a shortlist is created.
When the problem is turning an LLM, retrieval flow, model API, or agent idea into a usable product feature, the right hire needs product engineering depth. They should understand API contracts, auth, latency, streaming UX, fallbacks, telemetry, prompt versioning, eval gates, and how the feature behaves for real users. This is different from pure ML research or infrastructure work. You want someone who can connect model behavior to frontend states, backend services, user permissions, usage limits, analytics events, and support workflows.
Evidence to expect: Expect a working feature path, integration plan, model/provider abstraction, evaluation checklist, UX fallback behavior, and release-ready code review notes.
Bad AI answers are often caused by weak retrieval rather than weak prompting. The right specialist should inspect source quality, document parsing, chunking, metadata, embeddings, hybrid search, reranking, context windows, citation behavior, tool grounding, and evaluation sets. For enterprise systems, they also need to understand permissions, freshness, taxonomy, knowledge graph structure, and how users challenge or correct an answer. The outcome is a system that retrieves the right evidence and exposes uncertainty before the model speaks with confidence.
Evidence to expect: Expect retrieval diagnostics, benchmark queries, failed-answer analysis, source coverage notes, eval datasets, citation rules, and measurable answer-quality targets.
A pilot can look impressive while still being fragile. Production AI needs deployment automation, secrets management, model routing, observability, cost controls, drift checks, incident response, prompt/model versioning, rollback behavior, and security review. If the system touches regulated workflows, customer data, internal tools, or high-volume usage, reliability and governance become core engineering work. The right hire should reduce the operational risk of AI adoption rather than only add more features.
Evidence to expect: Expect monitoring plans, release gates, rollback paths, cost dashboards, data exposure review, incident runbooks, eval automation, and ownership boundaries.
Some AI work fails because the engineering starts before the operating workflow is understood. Forward-Deployed Engineers and AI Product Engineers are useful when you need someone to sit close to users, map the current process, identify high-value automation points, shape the proof of concept, and turn ambiguous requirements into a working workflow. They bridge product, engineering, operations, and leadership so the team does not spend weeks building a clever demo that cannot change a business metric.
Evidence to expect: Expect workflow maps, use-case triage, proof-point definition, integration constraints, adoption risks, and a build sequence tied to measurable operational value.
Clarify the constraint
We separate model, data, retrieval, product, infrastructure, security, and adoption problems before matching talent. A weak match happens when every AI problem is treated like the same role.
Match the proof point
The shortlist is built around what should be true by day 7: a working integration, retrieval benchmark, eval plan, workflow map, deployment path, security review, or production-quality handoff.
Check adjacent skills
Most AI roles overlap. We check whether the engineer also needs backend systems, data engineering, product sense, cloud infrastructure, UX judgment, or compliance awareness for your environment.
Avoid resume-only matching
A profile is not enough. We review evidence of shipped AI work, failure handling, security awareness, evaluation discipline, communication quality, and ability to work inside an existing team.
Every AI engineering engagement starts with scoped access, NDA/IP assignment, role-specific success criteria, and a first proof point the buyer can inspect. For specialist AI roles, governance also covers data handling, model/provider choices, prompt and model versioning, evaluation artifacts, source-code ownership, security review, cost visibility, human review rules, and operational handoff. The goal is not to send the most impressive AI resume. The goal is to put the right senior engineer on the constraint that actually blocks adoption, revenue, reliability, or speed.
Tell us the stack and the goal. We shortlist pre-vetted seniors within 24 hours and onboard within two business days.
Answers for CTOs, product leaders, and engineering leaders deciding whether to hire one AI specialist, build an AI pod, or start with a discovery sprint.
Start with the constraint, not the title. If the issue is product integration, look at AI Application or Full-Stack AI Engineers. If answers are weak, look at Retrieval, Knowledge, Context, or Evaluation specialists. If the pilot is fragile, look at MLOps, AI Reliability, Platform, or Security. If the workflow is still unclear, start with a Forward-Deployed Engineer or AI Product Engineer.
Yes. We compare the outcome against the roles required to ship it. One specialist is enough when the internal team already owns product, data, infrastructure, and security. A pod is better when the work crosses multiple systems or when speed depends on coordinated product, backend, data, MLOps, and governance work.
The proof depends on the role. It may be a working integration, retrieval benchmark, eval set, workflow map, model deployment plan, security review, cost baseline, data-readiness report, or production handoff plan. The point is that the first week should produce evidence you can inspect, not only onboarding updates.
Yes. The engineer joins the repositories, issue tracker, communication rhythm, cloud environment, model providers, data sources, and review process you approve. We scope access before onboarding and define how code, prompts, data artifacts, evaluation results, and documentation are handed back to your team.
Quality is controlled through role-specific screening, senior review, scoped proof points, code review, evaluation artifacts, security expectations, and replacement support. AI work is judged against the outcome: reliable answers, usable workflows, maintainable code, safe data handling, controlled cost, and clear ownership.
Yes. Many buyers start with a short discovery or pilot around one proof point. That may be a RAG benchmark, workflow automation slice, model deployment path, AI feature integration, governance checklist, or data-readiness review. If the evidence is strong, the engagement can expand into a dedicated hire or pod.
Devlyn AI engineers can plug into your existing team instead of replacing it. We define where the external specialist owns delivery, where your team reviews architecture, how access and IP are handled, and what artifacts must be handed back. This works well when your engineers know the product but need specialist depth in retrieval, agents, MLOps, AI security, model integration, or data readiness.